Pediatric cancer gene database (Pedican) Home
Pedican
Pediatric cancer database
General information | Literature | Expression | Regulation | Mutation | Interaction

Basic Information

Gene ID

672

Name

BRCA1

Synonymous

BRCAI|BRCC1|BROVCA1|IRIS|PNCA4|PPP1R53|PSCP|RNF53;breast cancer 1, early onset;BRCA1;breast cancer 1, early onset

Definition

BRCA1/BRCA2-containing complex, subunit 1|RING finger protein 53|breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility protein 1|breast and ovarian cancer sususceptibility protein 1|breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein|protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit

Position

17q21

Gene type

protein-coding

Cancer type

Abstract

Fanconi's anemia ;Hematological

Fanconi anemia (FA) and Bloom syndrome (BS) are rare autosomal recessive geneticdisorders manifesting in childhood, with a predisposition to cancer development in adolescence and adulthood. Both syndromes are relatively prevalent among the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and, in both syndromes, mutations specific to this population have been identified. Similarly, unique Ashkenazi mutations were found in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. These two genes, when mutated, play important roles in familial breast and ovarian carcinogenesis. The genes involved in the pathogenesis of the FA and BS belong to the general class of instability genes. Heterozygosity for the FA gene has no known promalignant potential, while the BSmutation carrier state was associated with an increased frequency of colorectal cancer. The especially frequent carrier state among the Ashkenazi Jewish population coupled with the high prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the same population has led us to search for coinheritance affecting the potential for cancer development. One hundred Ashkenazi women with known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were screened for the FA mutation IVS4+4 A-->T and the BS mutation blm(Ash). Our results indicate that there is an increased prevalence of both FA and BS mutation carriers among the population studied compared with the general Ashkenazi population (prevalence of FA mutation 4/100 women [4%] as compared to 35/3104 previously published controls [1.1%], P=0.031, and for BS mutation 3/100[3.2%] as compared to 36/4001 [0.9%], P=0.058). There was no statistically significant effect of the coinheritance on cancer prevalence, type of cancer, orage of cancer onset. Coinheritance of FA and/or BS mutations seems to be more prevalent among BRCA mutation carriers, but a larger study encompassing more women may help in clarifying this issue.

leukemia;Hematological

We describe monozygotic twins discordant for childhood leukemia and secondary thyroid carcinoma. We used bisulfite pyrosequencing to compare the constitutive promoter methylation of BRCA1 and several other tumor suppressor genes in primary fibroblasts. The affected twin displayed an increased BRCA1 methylation (12%), compared with her sister (3%). Subsequent bisulfite plasmid sequencing demonstrated that 13% (6 of 47) BRCA1 alleles were fully methylated in the affected twin, whereas her sister displayed only single CpG errors without functional implications. This between-twin methylation difference was also foundin irradiated fibroblasts and untreated saliva cells. The BRCA1 epimutation may have originated by an early somatic event in the affected twin: approximately 25% of her body cells derived from different embryonic cell lineages carry one epigenetically inactivated BRCA1 allele. This epimutation was associated with reduced basal protein levels and a higher induction of BRCA1 after DNA damage. In addition, we performed a genome-wide microarray analysis of both sisters and found several copy number variations, i.e., heterozygous deletion and reduced expression of the RSPO3 gene in the affected twin. This monozygotic twin pair represents an impressive example of epigenetic somatic mosaicism, suggesting a role for constitutive epimutations, maybe along with de novo genetic alterationsin recurrent tumor development.

thyroid Tumors ;Endocrine

We describe monozygotic twins discordant for childhood leukemia and secondary thyroid carcinoma. We used bisulfite pyrosequencing to compare the constitutive promoter methylation of BRCA1 and several other tumor suppressor genes in primary fibroblasts. The affected twin displayed an increased BRCA1 methylation (12%), compared with her sister (3%). Subsequent bisulfite plasmid sequencing demonstrated that 13% (6 of 47) BRCA1 alleles were fully methylated in the affected twin, whereas her sister displayed only single CpG errors without functional implications. This between-twin methylation difference was also foundin irradiated fibroblasts and untreated saliva cells. The BRCA1 epimutation may have originated by an early somatic event in the affected twin: approximately 25% of her body cells derived from different embryonic cell lineages carry one epigenetically inactivated BRCA1 allele. This epimutation was associated with reduced basal protein levels and a higher induction of BRCA1 after DNA damage. In addition, we performed a genome-wide microarray analysis of both sisters and found several copy number variations, i.e., heterozygous deletion and reduced expression of the RSPO3 gene in the affected twin. This monozygotic twin pair represents an impressive example of epigenetic somatic mosaicism, suggesting a role for constitutive epimutations, maybe along with de novo genetic alterationsin recurrent tumor development.

')