;;;

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a genetic disorder associated with an increased risk of childhood tumors. Here we describe a patient with BWS who developed a central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT). To our knowledge, despite the known cancer predisposition, this patient is the first described with BWS to develop an AT/RT. Due to the high propensity of these patients to develop childhood tumors, in addition to routine diagnostic tests, analysis of the tumor DNA using the Illumina Infinium whole-genome genotyping 550K Beadchip was performed to investigate a possible common underlying mechanism for his BWS and AT/RT. The only alteration detected was monosomy 22, which was accompanied by a somatic mutation in the INI1 rhabdoid tumor gene. These resultssuggest that, despite an underlying cancer predisposition, the occurrence of BWSand AT/RT in this patient may be unrelated.#CI- (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

AIMS: To correlate the immunostaining for INI1 protein and mutations in INI1 gene in possible rhabdoid tumours (RT) and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (AT/RT)seen at the Royal children's Hospital in the last 10 years, and to study the clinicopathological features of those patients with negative nuclear staining. METHODS: Twenty tumours showing suggestive histological and/or immunohistochemical features of RT and AT/RT were selected. Immunohistochemistryfor INI1 and molecular investigations for INI1 mutations were performed. The clinical features, histology and immunohistochemistry in those patients with negative nuclear staining were studied. RESULTS: In seven tumours the nuclei stained uniformly for INI1. In none of these was an INI1 mutation detected. In 13 tumours nuclei showed no staining. In only ten of these was material available for molecular studies. mutations were detected in nine. In these 13 patients, the primary tumour was in the central nervous system (CNS) in seven, in the soft tissue in three, in the liver in two and in the kidney in one. The age of presentation varied from 19 days to 7 years. Only five tumours showed large areas of rhabdoid cells. Most showed extensive non-diagnostic areas. In two an alternative diagnosis, ependymoma or myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissue, wasinitially suggested. ALL the CNS tumours were positive for EMA, GFAP, and SMA. There were no long term survivors, but an occasional patient showed excellent response to intensive chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, there is a strong correlation between the loss of INI1 immunostaining and the presence of an INI1 mutation suggesting that the former is a reliable marker for RT and AT/RT in children. As relatively few tumours showed uniform populations of rhabdoid cells, and some showed features suggesting another diagnosis, INI1 staining should be checked in ALL high grade CNS tumours and malignant extraCNS tumours where the diagnosis is unclear. The prognosis of RT is poor but medium term remission can be achieved in some patients with aggressive treatment.

Malignant rhabdoid tumor has traditionally been defined by its histologic phenotype. However, genetic investigations of malignant rhabdoid tumor have revealed a characteristic loss of or mutation in the INI1 gene on chromosome 22q. The occurrence and significance of soft tissue tumors meeting genetic criteria for malignant rhabdoid tumor but with an undifferentiated non-rhabdoid histologyis poorly characterized. Seventeen undifferentiated sarcomas, lacking rhabdoid histology were identified either through the surgical pathology files of The children's Hospital of Philadelphia (1980-2005) or in consultation. Immunohistochemistry for the INI1 protein showed a loss of nuclear expression within tumor cells in five of these cases. On histologic review, these five tumors had a featureless sheet-like architecture; four were small round blue cell tumors, and one showed focal spindling. Although they had variably prominent nucleoli, classic rhabdoid morphologic features were not identified in any of these cases at primary presentation. Additional immunohistochemistry showed a polyphenotypic profile. Four of the five tumors showed genetic abnormalities involving the INI1 gene by a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and/or mutational analysis. Patient ages ranged from 1 week to 5 years. Four patients were male, and one wasfemale. Sites included two neck tumors, two extremity tumors, and one paraspinaltumor. Two patients are alive and well over 15 years from the time of diagnosis;the remaining four are alive and well but with less than 2 years follow-up. Thus, alterations of the INI1 gene with consequent loss of expression identified a population of undifferentiated sarcomas lacking classic rhabdoid morphology in young patients, with evidence of favorable survival. Whether these undifferentiated sarcomas represent a clinicopathologic entity distinct from classic malignant rhabdoid tumor requires further investigation.