| General information | Literature | Expression | Regulation | Mutation | Interaction |
Basic Information | |
|---|---|
Gene ID | 3439 |
Name | IFNA1 |
Synonymous | IFL|IFN|IFN-ALPHA|IFN-alphaD|IFNA13|IFNA@;interferon, alpha 1;IFNA1;interferon, alpha 1 |
Definition | IFN-alpha 1b|IFN-alpha-1/13|interferon alpha 1b|interferon alpha-1/13|interferon alpha-D|interferon-alpha1|leIF D |
Position | 9p22 |
Gene type | protein-coding |
Cancer type | Abstract |
| Ewing's sarcoma ;Bone | Ewing's sarcoma is the second most common human bone tumor in childhood. Here, we investigated the sensitivity of the Ewing tumor cell line, SK-N-MC, to the apoptotic effect of type I (IFNalpha) and type II (IFNgamma) interferons and TNFalpha. We demonstrate that although IFNalpha and TNFalpha alone are unable toinduce cell death, they act in synergy with IFNgamma to induce SK-N-MC cell apoptosis. The synergistic induction of apoptosis correlated with the synergistic induction of TNFalpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) mRNA and TRAIL protein synthesis as well as of TRAIL secretion. Preparations of inducer-free supernatants from SK-N-MC cells stimulated with combinations of cytokines were shown to be cytotoxic for untreated SK-N-MC cells. This cytotoxicity was partially inhibited by addition of TRAILR2/Fc fusion protein, indicating that the secreted TRAIL mediates, at least in part, the apoptotic effect displayed by thesupernatants of stimulated SK-N-MC cells. We have shown that the presence of IFNgamma is required to allow the sustained expression of IRF1 in SK-N-MC cells stimulated by addition of IFNalpha or TNFalpha suggesting that IRF1 plays a rolein the synergistic induction of apoptosis by combinations of cytokines. Furthermore, we have shown that inhibition of NF-kappaB activation contributes to the IFNgamma-mediated sensitization to the apoptotic effect of TNFalpha. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that interferon/cytokine combinations are able to induce TRAIL gene expression and TRAIL protein synthesis and secretion in Ewing sarcoma-derived cells. We believe that the observations reported here might contribute to the development of alternative new approaches to the treatment of Ewing tumors resistant to conventional therapy.#CI- Copyright 2004 Nature Publishing Group |
| acute promyelocytic leukemia;Hematological | PURPOSE: Recent reports of the dramatic antitumor effect of all-trans retinoic acid (RA) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have generated renewed enthusiasm for clinical studies of retinoids for oncologic therapeutic indications. Here we provide an overview of relevant aspects of retinoid physiology and molecular biology, review preclinical studies indicating antitumor activity for retinoids, and summarize the current status of clinical investigations of retinoid use for the treatment of adult and pediatric tumors. DESIGN: The published literature was reviewed with attention to areas of retinoid research that would shed insight into the oncologic uses of retinoids. RESULTS: Retinoids play critical roles during normal fetal development and induce differentiation (and/or growth inhibition) in a variety of tumor-cell lines. Retinoid effects seem to result from changes in gene expression mediated via specific nuclear receptors (termed retinoic acid receptors, RAR-alpha, -beta, and -gamma), and a specific chromosomal translocation involving the RAR-alpha gene occurs in APL patients. In addition to the very high clinical response rate for RA in patients with APL, significant clinical responses have been observed for patients with cutaneous T-cell malignancies, juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia, and dermatologic malignancies. Additionally, the combination of 13-cis-retinoic acid (cRA) with interferon alpha (IFN alpha) has produced high objective response rates for patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and of the cervix. CONCLUSIONS: The antitumor activity demonstrated forretinoids (especially RA) alone and in combination with other agents supports the need for targeted phase II trials to define the spectrum of responsive tumors and for laboratory studies to further delineate the biologic mechanisms associated with therapeutic responses. High priority should then be given to phase III trials to delineate optimal strategies for improving outcome by combining retinoid-based treatments with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens. |