| General information | Literature | Expression | Regulation | Mutation | Interaction |
Basic Information | |
|---|---|
Gene ID | 2308 |
Name | FOXO1 |
Synonymous | FKH1|FKHR|FOXO1A;forkhead box O1;FOXO1;forkhead box O1 |
Definition | forkhead box protein O1|forkhead box protein O1A|forkhead, Drosophila, homolog of, in rhabdomyosarcoma |
Position | 13q14.1 |
Gene type | protein-coding |
Cancer type | Abstract |
| Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma;muscular | The FKHR gene was first identified from its disruption by the t(2;13) chromosomal translocation seen in the pediatric tumor alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. It encodes for a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors. Recently, a homolog of FKHR in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was identified called DAF-16, which is a downstream target of two Akt homologs in an insulin-related signalingpathway. We have examined the possible role of Akt in the regulation of FKHR. Wefind that FKHR can bind in vitro to the insulin-responsive sequence (IRS) in theinsulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 promoter and can activate transcription from a reporter plasmid containing multiple copies of the IRS. expression of active but not inactive Akt can suppress FKHR-mediated transcriptional activation. Akt can phosphorylate FKHR in vitro on three phosphoacceptor sites, at least a subset of which can also be phosphorylated by Akt in vivo. Importantly, mutation of these three sites to alanine residues enhances the transcriptional activity of FKHR and renders it resistant to inhibition by Akt. expression of an Akt-resistant mutant of FKHR causes apoptosis in 293T cells in a manner dependent on DNA binding. These results suggest that FKHR may be a direct nuclear regulatory target for Akt in both metabolic and cell survival pathways. |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma;muscular | The genetic mechanisms that control proliferation of childhood musculoskeletal malignancies, notably Ewing's tumor (ET) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), remain largely unknown. Most human cancers appear to overexpress at least one of the G1cyclins (cyclins D1, D2, D3, E1, and E2) to bypass normal regulation of cell cycle G1 progression. We compared the gene expression profiles of 7 ET and 13 RMS primary tumor samples and found overexpression of cyclin D1 in ALL 7 ET samples.In contrast, RMS samples expressed higher levels of cyclin D2, cyclin D3, and cyclin E1. This was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. The relative roles of RAS-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathways in the regulation of D-type cyclin expression in these tumors were thenassessed. Inhibition of either pathway reduced expression of cyclins D1, D2, andD3 in RMS lines, whereas only PI3K inhibitors blocked cyclin D1, D2, and D3 expression in ET lines. Furthermore, PI3K-AKT appeared to regulate D-type cyclintranscription in RMS lines through FKHR and FKHRL1. Finally, the role of the ET-associated EWS-FLI1 fusion gene in regulating D cyclin expression was studied. Inhibition of EWS-FLI1 expression in the TC71 ET line decreased cyclin D1 levelsbut increased cyclin D3 levels. In contrast, induction of EWS-FLI1 expression inthe RD RMS cell line increased cyclin D1 expression but decreased cyclin D3 expression. Our results demonstrate distinct regulation of D-type cyclins in ET and RMS and indicate that EWS-FLI1 can modulate the expression of D-type cyclinsindependent of cellular backgrounds. |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma;muscular | Rhabdomyosarcoma, the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, likely results from deregulation of the skeletal myogenesis program. Although associations between PAX3, PAX7, FOXO1A, and RMS tumorigenesis are well recognized, the entire spectrum of genetic factors underlying RMS development and progression is unclear. Using a combined approach of spectral karyotyping, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and expression analysis, we examined 10primary RMS tumors, including embryonal, alveolar, and the rare adult pleomorphic variant, to explore the involvement of different genes and genetic pathways in RMS tumorigenesis. A complete karyotype established for each tumor revealed a high aneuploidy level, mostly tetraploidy, with double minutes and additional structural aberrations. Quantitative expression analysis detected the overexpression of the AURKA gene in ALL tumors tested, suggesting a role for this mitotic regulator in the aneuploidy and chromosomal instability observed in RMS.Array-based CGH analysis in primary RMS tumors detected copy number changes of genes involved in multiple genetic pathways, including transcription factors such as MYC-related gene from lung cancer and the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion-encoding genes laminin gamma-2 and p21-activated kinase-1. Our data suggest the involvement of genes encoding cell adhesion, cytoskeletal signaling,and transcriptional and cell cycle components in RMS tumorigenesis. |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma;muscular | Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood, withpresumed skeletal muscle origins, because of its myogenic phenotype. RMS is composed of two main subtypes, embryonal RMS (eRMS) and alveolar RMS (aRMS). Whereas eRMS histologically resembles embryonic skeletal muscle, the aRMS subtype is more aggressive and has a poorer prognosis. In addition, whereas the genetic profile of eRMS is not well established, aRMS is commonly associated with distinct chromosome translocations that fuse domains of the transcription factors Pax3 and Pax7 to the forkhead family member FOXO1A. Both eRMS and aRMS tumor cells express myogenic markers such as MyoD, but their ability to complete differentiation is impaired. How this impairment occurs is the subject of this review, which will focus on several themes, including signaling pathways that converge on Pax-forkhead gene targets, alterations in MyoD function, epigenetic modifications of myogenic promoters, and microRNAs whose expression patterns in RMS alter key regulatory circuits to help maintain tumor cells in an opportunistically less differentiated state.#CI- (c) 2013 FEBS. |