3838

KPNA2

karyopherin alpha 2 (RAG cohort 1, importin alpha 1);KPNA2;karyopherin alpha 2 (RAG cohort 1, importin alpha 1)

RAG cohort 1|RAG cohort protein 1|SRP1-alpha|importin alpha 1|importin alpha 2|importin subunit alpha-1|importin subunit alpha-2|importin-alpha-P1|karyopherin subunit alpha-2|pendulin

17q24.2

protein-coding

Karyopherin-alpha2 (KPNA2) functions as an adaptor that transports several proteins to the nucleus. We investigated the clinical and functional significance of KPNA2 in gastric cancer (GC). Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine KPNA2 expression in primary GC and metastatic lymph nodes. Next, KPNA2 was suppressed by small interfering RNA (siRNA) to examine KPNA2 function in proliferation and cisplatin-induced apoptosis of GC cell lines. Nuclear expression of KPNA2 in marginal regions of primary GC was stronger than in central regions of GC and normal tissues. The high expression of marginal KPNA2 was significantly associated with beta-catenin accumulation in the nucleus and poor prognosis in two independent GC cohorts (discovery cohort, n = 90, P = 0.018; validation cohort, n = 89, P = 0.0125). We detected correlations between nuclear KPNA2 expression in marginal region and progression of macroscopic type (P = 0.036), tumor depth (P = 0.013), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0064), venous invasion (P = 0.034) and clinical stage (P = 0.0006). Nuclear KPNA2 expression in marginal regions of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly higher than in the central region. It was associated with poor survival of GC patients with lymph node metastasis (n = 96; center, P = 0.4384; marginal, P < 0.0001). KPNA2 suppression enhanced cisplatin-induced apoptosis and reduced proliferation in the KPNA2 siRNA group compared with the control siRNA group. The expression of the DNA repair gene NBS1 (NBN) in the nucleus was suppressed in KPNA2-suppressed cells. KPNA2 might be a useful prognostic marker and an effective therapeutic target for GC.

PURPOSE: To analyze rates of expression of karyopherin alpha 2 (KPNA2) in different prostate tissues and to evaluate the prognostic properties for patients with primary prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tissue microarrays (TMA) contained 798 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate tissue cores from two different institutes of pathology. TMAs were stained immunohistochemically for KPNA2 and NBS1. SiRNA technologies were used to inhibit KPNA2 expression in vitro, and the effect of this inhibition on cellular viability was determined. Efficiency of knockdown experiments was determined by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: KPNA2 expression was significantly upregulated in carcinomas of the prostate, especially in metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer samples. Positive nuclear KPNA2 immunoreactivity was identified as a novel predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (n = 348), and was independent of the well-established predictive factors preoperative PSA value, Gleason score, tumor stage, and surgical margin status. These results were validated by analyzing a second and independent prostate cancer cohort (n = 330). Further, in vitro experiments showed that the cell proliferation and viability of PC3 cells was significantly reduced when KPNA2 expression was inhibited. KPNA2 knockdown did not induce PARP cleavage as marker for apoptosis. No significantly increased sub-G(1) fraction could be found by FACS analysis. CONCLUSIONS: KPNA2 is a novel independent prognostic marker for disease progression after radical prostatectomy. This allows to identify patients who need more aggressive treatment. It can moreover be speculated that patients not suited for surveillance regimens might be identified at initial biopsy by a positive KPNA2 immunohistochemistry.