4691

NCL

In our previous study, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been identified to be involved in gastric cancer progression. Notably, nuclear protein C23 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) have been linked into EMT. However, the specific mechanisms underlying BMP2 pathway-mediated EMT are not still unraveled. In this study, we adopted immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting to determine the expression of C23 and BMP2 receptor II (BMPR-II) in 90 gastric cancer samples and cell lines. Subsequently, relevant cell lines were selected to be treated with si-C23 or si-BMPRII and the detection of in vitro assay. Our results revealed that both C23 and BMPRII were aberrantly and constitutively expressed in gastric cancer specimens and cell lines, whose expression was positively associated with metastasis, stage and differentiation, and portended poor survival outcome of gastric cancer patients. In vitro assay validated the increased expression of p-Erk1/2, p-Akt, vimentin, N-cadherin, and MMP2 in BMP2-stimulated MGC803 cells, which was in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, si-C23 treatment attenuated the BMP2-stimulated expression of p-Erk1/2, p-Akt, vimentin, N-cadherin, and MMP2. Also, the treatment of either si-C23 or si-BMPRII decreased the ability of migration and invasion of MGC803 cells. In conclusion, C23 mediates BMP2-induced EMT progression via the up-regulation of Erk1/2 and Akt signaling pathway in gastric cancer, which indicated both C23 and BMPRII pathway could be recommended as prospective targets or biomarkers to antagonize the progression of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) function as key molecules in cancer progression. The lncRNA CYTOR plays oncogenic roles in multiple types of cancer, yet the detailed molecular mechanisms of those roles remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance, biological function and interacting partners of CYTOR in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive analysis of CYTOR expression was performed in 138 CRC samples and in the TCGA and GEO databases. Biological function was investigated through knockdown and overexpression of CYTOR in vitro and in vivo. In addition, its protein binding partner was identified and validated using ChIRP-MS and RNA immunoprecipitation assays. Their key interaction sites on CYTOR were verified by CRISPR/Cas9 and a series of mutant constructs. Furthermore, the downstream targets of CYTOR were confirmed via immunoblotting and luciferase reporter assays. RESULTS: CYTOR was significantly up-regulated in CRC samples and associated with poor prognosis, promoting proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. NCL and Sam68 could recognize their specific motifs and directly bind to EXON1 of CYTOR. Moreover, EXON1 was the key functional site mediating the interaction of CYTOR with NCL and Sam68. NCL and Sam68 functioned as oncogenes to promote CRC progression. Furthermore, we confirmed that the heterotrimeric complex of CYTOR, NCL and Sam68 activated the NF-kappaB pathway and EMT to contribute to CRC progression. CONCLUSION: CYTOR plays important roles in CRC progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68 and may serve as a prognostic biomarker and/or an effective target for CRC therapies.