Oncogene database

7133

TNFRSF1B

tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1B;TNFRSF1B;tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1B

TNF-R2|TNF-RII|p75 TNF receptor|p80 TNF-alpha receptor|soluble TNFR1B variant 1|tumor necrosis factor beta receptor|tumor necrosis factor binding protein 2|tumor necrosis factor receptor 2|tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B|tumor necrosi

1p36.22

protein-coding

Oxidative stress-modulated signaling pathways have been implicated in carcinogenesis and therapy resistance. The lens epithelium derived growth factor p75 (LEDGF/p75) is a transcription co-activator that promotes resistance to stress-induced cell death. This protein has been implicated in inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, HIV-AIDS, and cancer. Although LEDGF/p75 is emerging as a stress survival oncoprotein, there is scarce information on its expression in human tumors. The present study was performed to evaluate its expression in a comprehensive panel of human cancers. Transcript expression was examined in the Oncomine cancer gene microarray database and in a TissueScan cancer Survey Panel quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) array. Protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cancer tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 1735 tissues representing single or replicate cores from 1220 individual cases (985 tumor and 235 normal tissues). A total of 21 major cancer types were analyzed. Analysis of LEDGF/p75 transcript expression in Oncomine datasets revealed significant upregulation (tumor vs. normal) in 15 out of 17 tumor types. The TissueScan cancer Q-PCR array revealed significantly elevated LEDGF/p75 transcript expression in prostate, colon, thyroid, and breast cancers. IHC analysis of TMAs revealed significant increased levels of LEDGF/p75 protein in prostate, colon, thyroid, liver and uterine tumors, relative to corresponding normal tissues. Elevated transcript or protein expression of LEDGF/p75 was observed in several tumor types. These results further establish LEDGF/p75 as a cancer-related protein, and provide a rationale for ongoing studies aimed at understanding the clinical significance of its expression in specific human cancers.

The v-erbA oncoprotein P75gag-v-erbA, derived from the thyroid hormone receptor alpha (TR alpha), functions as a transdominant transcriptional repressor. The mechanism by which P75gag-v-erbA acts is however poorly characterized. Here, we show that repression of TR alpha mediated transcription by P75gag-v-erbA in transformed erythroblasts is dependent on the structure of the thyroid hormone response element to which it binds. A very efficient repression was seen with hormone response elements having half-sites organized as everted repeats (ER), whereas repression was inefficient with directly repeated half-sites (DR). Promoters containing half-sites organized as an inverted palindrome (IR) gave an intermediate repression. Although P75gag-v-erbA failed to associate with the ligand binding domain of retinoid X (RXR) receptor in a two-hybrid test, the oncoprotein in nuclear extracts from transformed cells heterodimerised quantitatively with RXR upon binding to response elements of the DR type. On the other hand, both RXR/P75gag-v-erb heterodimers and other types of dimers formed on ER elements. P75gag-v-erbA also failed to bind to elements that contained only one half-site in vivo and in vitro. The data demonstrate that P75gag-v-erbA represses gene expression efficiently as a dimer, and suggest that thyroid hormone responsive genes that may be targets for the action of the oncoprotein are repressed most efficiently if they contain elements of the ER type.

The oncogenic counterpart of thyroid hormone receptor-alpha (TRRalpha), denoted P75gag-v-erbA, has served as a paradigm for the ability of TRs to repress basal levels of transcription. We show here that the retinoid X receptor (RXR), when activated by its specific ligand SR11237, is repressed by both the normal TRalpha and the P75gag-v-erbA. The repression caused by the two proteins is distinct and dependent on both the cell type and the hormone-response element through which RXR acts. In HeLa cells only TR repressed efficiently through the palindromic 2xIR0 element, whereas the proteins were equally efficient in JEG cells. This demonstrates that proteins distinct in the two cell types mediate the repression. RXR-dependent induction via the natural response element of the cellular retinol-binding protein (CRBPII) gene was likewise (> or = 50%) repressed by TR, whereas P75gag-v-erbA did not repress during the same conditions. Furthermore, P75gag-v-erbA and its variants v-erbAtd359 (lacking repressing activity on TR) and v-erbAr12 (a highly active repressor of TR) efficiently repressed induction by a hybrid protein consisting of the DNA- binding domain of Gal4 and the ligand-binding region of RXR. The viral proteins did not, however, associate with RXR unless the two partners were allowed to heterodimerize upon binding to a specific response element, such as the 2xIR0 element or that of the CRBPII gene. In conclusion, we suggest that the efficient repression seen with the the 2xIR0 element is due to heterodimerization of TR or the viral oncoproteins with RXR and a concomitant inhibition of binding of the RXR-specific ligand that results in an inability of RXR to attract a cell type-specific cofactor. In addition, the data suggest that the interaction between RXR and P75gag-v-erbA on the CRBPII element is too weak to inhibit RXR from binding a ligand and therefore also to repress.