7849

PAX8

paired box 8;PAX8;paired box 8

paired box protein Pax-8|paired domain gene 8

2q13

protein-coding

BACKGROUND: The distinction of metastatic ovarian carcinoma from other metastatic carcinomas and primary adnexal lesions in the skin is often difficult. PAX8 is a transcription factor that plays a critical role in development of the Mullerian system and has been shown to be a useful discriminatory marker between ovarian and breast carcinomas. Identification of ovarian cutaneous metastases may be of benefit in patients with familial breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome. METHODS: PAX8 immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 24 cases of metastatic adenocarcinomas to the skin and compared with 7 cases of primary adnexal lesions and also compared with p63 immunohistochemical staining results. Patients with metastatic adenocarcinomas had clinically documented primary malignancies, and patients with primary adnexal carcinomas had no known history of another adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Cutaneous ovarian and renal cell carcinoma metastases (2/2 and 8/8, respectively) showed positive nuclear expression of PAX8. PAX8 immunohistochemical staining in primary adnexal and other cutaneous metastases was completely negative (0/7 and 0/16, respectively). The p63 expression profile supported the distinction between adnexal and metastatic adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Although cutaneous ovarian metastasis is a rare phenomenon, the prognosis is extremely poor. PAX8 expression is a useful marker that effectively discriminated metastatic ovarian carcinomas from metastatic breast carcinomas and primary adnexal tumors.

PAX2 and PAX8 are transcription factors that are essential in embryonic development of mullerian organs. They may also play a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX2 and PAX8 relative to one another has not been comprehensively studied. Archival tissue samples for normal or non-neoplastic tissue (251), primary epithelial neoplasms (316 for PAX2 and 357 for PAX8), and metastatic epithelial neoplasms (16), all of mullerian origin, were subjected to PAX2 and PAX8 immunostaining. The staining frequency, extent, and intensity for these markers were compared. Virtually identical PAX2 and PAX8 expressions were noted in non-neoplastic tissue. They were constantly seen in most epithelial cells (but not in stromal cells) of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, paratubal cyst, endosalpingiosis, endometriosis, and endometrial polyp. Within the primary epithelial neoplasms, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 55% and 98% of serous tumors, 25% and 94% of endometrioid tumors, 19% and 100% of clear cell tumors, 11% and 67% of transitional/undifferentiated tumors, and 10% and 22% of mucinous tumors, respectively. Regardless of histologic subtypes, PAX2 staining was noted in fewer cells and with less staining intensity compared with PAX8. No tumor showed only PAX2 staining. Within the metastatic carcinomas, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 38% and 98% of cases, respectively, with a diffuse and strong staining for PAX8, contrasting with a patchy and weak PAX2 expression. PAX2 and PAX8 are constantly expressed in normal or non-neoplastic tissue of mullerian origin. For primary and metastatic mullerian epithelial tumors, PAX8 shows strong and diffuse staining in most cases of all histologic subtypes, except in mucinous tumors. In contrast, PAX2 expression is always less than PAX8, and exclusive staining for PAX2 is not seen. PAX8 supersedes PAX2 as probably the best epithelial marker hitherto for primary or metastatic mullerian epithelial tumors.

TTF-1 and napsin A are useful biomarkers for differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic tumors. Studies have shown, however, that TTF-1 and napsin A also can be expressed in extrapulmonary carcinomas, and that a small fraction of primary lung adenocarcinomas do not co-express these two markers. We attempted to determine whether a tissue-specific transcriptional factor, PAX8, can help determine primary sites of lung carcinomas. Immunohistochemical stains for PAX8, TTF-1 and napsin A were performed on 103 cases of metastatic lung carcinomas from a variety of origins and 120 cases of primary lung adenocarcinomas. Our data demonstrated that all 103 metastatic carcinomas were negative for napsin A, while 14 (13.6%; four thyroid, two endometrium, three colon, one prostate, one salivary adenoid cystic, two renal cell carcinomas, and one ovary) showed weak to strong TTF-1 nuclear staining in 5-60% of the tumor cells. All primary lung adenocarcinomas were negative for PAX8, whereas 46 (44.7%) metastatic carcinomas from the kidney (29/33), ovary (6/8), endometrium (5/5), endocervix (1/1), thyroid (4/5) and urinary tract (1/3) were positive for PAX8. Our data demonstrate that of combined use of PAX8, TTF-1 and napsin A is reliable to separate reliably lung primary from metastatic tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To examine squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) from diverse anatomic sites and invasive urothelial carcinomas (UCs) for expression of the oncofetal antigen glypican 3 (GPC3), the paired box transcription factor PAX8, and the DeltaN isoform of p63 (p40). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for GPC3, PAX8, and p40 was performed on whole sections of 107 SCCs from 11 anatomic sites and 49 UCs; evaluation included extent and intensity of staining. RESULTS: GPC3 was detected in 20% of SCCs and 12% of UCs and PAX8 in 3% of SCCs, limited to the uterine cervix, and 10% of UCs. p40 Was found in 99% of SCCs and 96% of UCs. CONCLUSIONS: GPC3 expression is frequent in SCC/UC, awareness of which should guard against an incorrect diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, while PAX8, limited in distribution, may have some use in suggesting a cervical or urothelial tract origin in a metastatic squamotransitional carcinoma of unknown primary. There is no drop-off in sensitivity for the diagnoses of SCC or UC with DeltaNp63-specific immunohistochemistry, and if this performance can be extended to other applications, p40 may supplant the dominant "pan-p63" antibody clone.

PAX 8 is a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the kidney, Mullerian organs, and thyroid. It may also have a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX 8 has not been comprehensively studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples for non-neoplastic tissues (n=1601), primary neoplasms (n=933), and metastatic neoplasms (n=496) were subjected to PAX 8 immunostain. In non-neoplastic tissues, PAX 8 was consistently noted in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting ductal cells, atrophic renal tubular epithelial cells regardless of nephronic segments, and epithelial cells of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, seminal vesicle, epidydimis, thyroid, pancreatic islet cells, and lymphoid cells. PAX 8 was not seen in the rest of the tissue samples. In primary neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 194 of 240 (89%) renal cell neoplasms, by 238 of 267 (89%) Mullerian-type neoplasms, by 65 of 65 (100%) thyroid follicular cell neoplasms, by 8 of 8 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and by 17 of 17 (100%) lymphomas. Weak focal staining was noted in 5 of 12 (42%) cases of parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma and in 6 of 17 (35%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. PAX 8 was not seen in other neoplasms. In metastatic neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 90 of 102 (88%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, by 57 of 63 metastatic Mullerian tumors (90%), and by 6 of 6 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas (100%). There was also weak focal staining for 1 of 15 metastatic small cell carcinomas and for 1 of 9 metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PAX 8 was not seen in other metastatic neoplasms. It can be successfully identified in routinely processed tissue samples, and its expression is mostly nuclear. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissues is limited to the organs, the embryonic development of which depends on this transcription factor. This tissue/cell-specific expression is maintained during both neoplastic transformation and metastasis. PAX 8 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal, Mullerian, or thyroid origin in both primary and metastatic sites.

PAX2 and PAX8 are transcription factors that are essential in embryonic development of mullerian organs. They may also play a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX2 and PAX8 relative to one another has not been comprehensively studied. Archival tissue samples for normal or non-neoplastic tissue (251), primary epithelial neoplasms (316 for PAX2 and 357 for PAX8), and metastatic epithelial neoplasms (16), all of mullerian origin, were subjected to PAX2 and PAX8 immunostaining. The staining frequency, extent, and intensity for these markers were compared. Virtually identical PAX2 and PAX8 expressions were noted in non-neoplastic tissue. They were constantly seen in most epithelial cells (but not in stromal cells) of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, paratubal cyst, endosalpingiosis, endometriosis, and endometrial polyp. Within the primary epithelial neoplasms, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 55% and 98% of serous tumors, 25% and 94% of endometrioid tumors, 19% and 100% of clear cell tumors, 11% and 67% of transitional/undifferentiated tumors, and 10% and 22% of mucinous tumors, respectively. Regardless of histologic subtypes, PAX2 staining was noted in fewer cells and with less staining intensity compared with PAX8. No tumor showed only PAX2 staining. Within the metastatic carcinomas, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 38% and 98% of cases, respectively, with a diffuse and strong staining for PAX8, contrasting with a patchy and weak PAX2 expression. PAX2 and PAX8 are constantly expressed in normal or non-neoplastic tissue of mullerian origin. For primary and metastatic mullerian epithelial tumors, PAX8 shows strong and diffuse staining in most cases of all histologic subtypes, except in mucinous tumors. In contrast, PAX2 expression is always less than PAX8, and exclusive staining for PAX2 is not seen. PAX8 supersedes PAX2 as probably the best epithelial marker hitherto for primary or metastatic mullerian epithelial tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors can present as liver metastases before discovery of the primary tumor. Islet 1 and PAX8 have recently been proposed as markers for neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin. In this study, we compared the utility of Islet 1 and PAX8 in distinguishing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine tumors of other sites and determined the usefulness of an immunohistochemical panel, including TTF1, CDX2, Islet 1 and/or PAX8, in identifying metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. A total of 110 primary neuroendocrine tumors (33 pancreatic, 31 pulmonary, 23 ileal, 14 rectal, and 9 gastric) and 73 metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (28 pancreatic, 5 pulmonary, 37 ileal, 1 rectal, 1 colonic, and 1 duodenal) were studied. Islet 1 and PAX8 were positive in 27/33 (82%) and 29/33 (88%), respectively, of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and in 19/28 (68%) and 15/28 (54%), respectively, of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. No cases of primary (0/23) or metastatic (0/37) ileal neuroendocrine tumors were positive with either Islet 1 or PAX8. There was Islet 1 positivity in 2/31 (6%) primary pulmonary, 12/14 (86%) primary rectal, and 1/1 metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumors, and PAX8 positivity in 7/31 (23%) primary pulmonary, 11/14 (79%) primary rectal, and 2/9 (22%) primary gastric neuroendocrine tumors. ROC curve analysis incorporating sensitivity and specificity data of immunohistochemical panels for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors showed that a four-stain panel, including Islet 1, PAX8, TTF1, and CDX2 significantly outperformed a three-stain panel composed of PAX8, TTF1, and CDX2 (P=0.019), and also showed a trend for better performance compared with a three-stain panel composed of Islet 1, TTF1, and CDX2 (P=0.072). Both Islet 1 and PAX8 are reliable immunohistochemical markers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and would be useful adjuncts to other markers (TTF1, CDX2) currently used to work up a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: Metastases from ovarian neoplasms are commonly encountered in peritoneal fluids. In addition, reactive mesothelial cells in effusion specimens can mimic ovarian serous carcinoma, making the diagnosis difficult. Calretinin has been recognized as a reliable immunohistochemical marker for mesothelial cells, whereas WT1 has proven useful in the diagnosis of ovarian serous carcinoma. This can present a diagnostic pitfall in effusion cytology, because mesothelial cells can demonstrate immunoreactivity for WT1. Recently, paired box gene 8 (PAX8) has been used in distinguishing ovarian from mammary carcinoma. To the authors knowledge, no studies using PAX8 have been performed on peritoneal cytology specimens to date, and its expression in metastatic ovarian serous carcinoma has not been studied. METHODS: These markers, along with BerEP4 and MOC-31, were evaluated in cytology cell block preparations from 30 fluid cytology specimens and 11 fine-needle aspiration specimens. RESULTS: PAX8 was found to be positive in 37 of 41 (90%) ovarian carcinoma cases studied, and was a sensitive (90%) and specific (100%) marker for the detection of metastatic ovarian carcinoma. In addition, calretinin was found to be useful for identifying mesothelial cells in fluid cytology. Furthermore, although PAX8 and WT1 have demonstrated comparable sensitivity (90% and 93%, respectively) in diagnosing metastatic ovarian carcinoma, PAX8 appears to have superior specificity because staining is not observed in mesothelial cells. BerEP4 and MOC-31 were found to have a lower sensitivity and specificity compared with PAX8. CONCLUSIONS: PAX8-positive, calretinin-negative staining appears to be highly specific and sensitive for detecting metastatic ovarian serous carcinoma in cytologic preparations and can be useful in distinguishing it from mesothelial cells in fluid cytology.

PAX 8 is a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the kidney, Mullerian organs, and thyroid. It may also have a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX 8 has not been comprehensively studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples for non-neoplastic tissues (n=1601), primary neoplasms (n=933), and metastatic neoplasms (n=496) were subjected to PAX 8 immunostain. In non-neoplastic tissues, PAX 8 was consistently noted in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting ductal cells, atrophic renal tubular epithelial cells regardless of nephronic segments, and epithelial cells of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, seminal vesicle, epidydimis, thyroid, pancreatic islet cells, and lymphoid cells. PAX 8 was not seen in the rest of the tissue samples. In primary neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 194 of 240 (89%) renal cell neoplasms, by 238 of 267 (89%) Mullerian-type neoplasms, by 65 of 65 (100%) thyroid follicular cell neoplasms, by 8 of 8 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and by 17 of 17 (100%) lymphomas. Weak focal staining was noted in 5 of 12 (42%) cases of parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma and in 6 of 17 (35%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. PAX 8 was not seen in other neoplasms. In metastatic neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 90 of 102 (88%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, by 57 of 63 metastatic Mullerian tumors (90%), and by 6 of 6 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas (100%). There was also weak focal staining for 1 of 15 metastatic small cell carcinomas and for 1 of 9 metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PAX 8 was not seen in other metastatic neoplasms. It can be successfully identified in routinely processed tissue samples, and its expression is mostly nuclear. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissues is limited to the organs, the embryonic development of which depends on this transcription factor. This tissue/cell-specific expression is maintained during both neoplastic transformation and metastasis. PAX 8 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal, Mullerian, or thyroid origin in both primary and metastatic sites.

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to determine the utility of PAX2 and PAX8 in cytology effusions with metastatic tumor. STUDY DESIGN: PAX2 and PAX8 immunohistochemical staining was performed on cell blocks of 89 pleural, pericardial and peritoneal effusions with benign diagnoses (18 cases), or secondary to renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 9 cases), mullerian carcinoma (21 cases) or non-mullerian carcinoma (41 cases). RESULTS: PAX2 stained 0% (0/18) of controls, 100% (8/8) of RCCs, 35% (7/20) of mullerian carcinomas, and 2% (1/41) of non-mullerian carcinomas. PAX8 stained 6% (1/18) of control cases, 100% (9/9) of RCC cases, 100% (20/20) of mullerian carcinomas, and 5% (2/41) of non-mullerian carcinomas. PAX2 was 35% sensitive and 95% specific for mullerian carcinoma and 100% sensitive and 95% specific for RCC. PAX8 was 100% sensitive and 95% specific for mullerian carcinoma and 100% sensitive and 95% specific for RCC. CONCLUSIONS: PAX8 is more sensitive than PAX2 for metastatic effusions from mullerian carcinomas (100 vs. 35%), while also having a higher intensity of staining than PAX2. However, PAX2 and PAX8 are both highly sensitive and specific for RCCs. PAX2 and PAX8 are valuable diagnostic markers for metastatic mullerian carcinomas and RCCs in effusion cytology. PAX8 is superior for carcinomas of mullerian origin.

PAX 8 is a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the kidney, Mullerian organs, and thyroid. It may also have a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX 8 has not been comprehensively studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples for non-neoplastic tissues (n=1601), primary neoplasms (n=933), and metastatic neoplasms (n=496) were subjected to PAX 8 immunostain. In non-neoplastic tissues, PAX 8 was consistently noted in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting ductal cells, atrophic renal tubular epithelial cells regardless of nephronic segments, and epithelial cells of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, seminal vesicle, epidydimis, thyroid, pancreatic islet cells, and lymphoid cells. PAX 8 was not seen in the rest of the tissue samples. In primary neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 194 of 240 (89%) renal cell neoplasms, by 238 of 267 (89%) Mullerian-type neoplasms, by 65 of 65 (100%) thyroid follicular cell neoplasms, by 8 of 8 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and by 17 of 17 (100%) lymphomas. Weak focal staining was noted in 5 of 12 (42%) cases of parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma and in 6 of 17 (35%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. PAX 8 was not seen in other neoplasms. In metastatic neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 90 of 102 (88%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, by 57 of 63 metastatic Mullerian tumors (90%), and by 6 of 6 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas (100%). There was also weak focal staining for 1 of 15 metastatic small cell carcinomas and for 1 of 9 metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PAX 8 was not seen in other metastatic neoplasms. It can be successfully identified in routinely processed tissue samples, and its expression is mostly nuclear. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissues is limited to the organs, the embryonic development of which depends on this transcription factor. This tissue/cell-specific expression is maintained during both neoplastic transformation and metastasis. PAX 8 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal, Mullerian, or thyroid origin in both primary and metastatic sites.

AIMS: Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) has been a diagnostic challenge for decades. The PAX8-PPARgamma rearrangement has been detected in FTC and classic papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). The aims of this study were to assess the presence of PAX8-PPARgamma by using tissue microarrays in a large cohort of different thyroid neoplasms, and to assess its diagnostic and prognostic implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for PAX8-PPARgamma was performed on 226 thyroid tumours, comprising FTCs (n = 59), PTCs (n = 126), poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDs; n = 34), follicular thyroid adenomas (FTAs; n = 5), and follicular tumours of unknown malignant potential (FTUMPs; n = 2). PAX8-PPARgamma was detected in 12% of FTCs, 1% of PTCs, 7% of PDs, and in both cases of FTUMP. There was no correlation between the extent of capsular or vascular invasion and PAX8-PPARgamma, or between lymph node or haematogenous metastasis and PAX8-PPARgamma. Overall survival (OS), tumour-specific survival (TSS) and relapse-free-survival (RFS) were not influenced by PAX8-PPARgamma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the presence of PAX8-PPARgamma in PDs and FTUMPs, whereas in FTCs and PTCs the prevalence of PAX8-PPARgamma is lower than previously reported. PAX8-PPARgamma did not correlate with invasiveness or affect prognosis in any tumour type.