Cancer metastasis gene database Home
Cancer metastasis database
General information | Literature | Expression | Regulation | Mutation | Homolog | Interaction

Basic Information

Gene ID

652

Name

BMP4

Synonymous

bone morphogenetic protein 4;BMP4;bone morphogenetic protein 4

Definition

BMP-2B|BMP-4|bone morphogenetic protein 2B

Position

14q22-q23

Gene type

protein-coding

Title

Abstract

breast cancer

AIM: To analyze the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in prostate and breast cancers with established metastasis in bone, where prostate cancer causes osteoblastic metastases, and breast cancer osteolytic metastases. METHODS: Primary tumor specimens from 20 patients with prostate cancer and 15 with breast cancer were studied for BMP-2/4, -3, -5, -6 and -7 immunohistochemistry. All patients had multiple bone metastases proven by bone scan. We also examined BMPs expression in normal prostate and breast tissues. BMPs expression was compared with clinicopathological and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: Cytoplasmic BMPs immunostaining was observed in both prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue. expression of BMP-2/4, -5, -6, and -7 proteins was detected in all normal prostate samples, with the predominance of BMP-2/4 (87.8-/+11.4% positive cells) and BMP-7 (94.6-/+0.9% positive cells). In prostate cancer tissues, we found variable expression of all BMPs. BMP-2/4 (83-/+11.6% positive cells) was predominantly expressed in prostate carcinoma, whereas the expression of BMP-7 (24.3-/+19.2% positive cells) was significantly lower than in the normal prostate. In all breast cancers tissues, we found nuclear staining only for BMP-7. In normal breast tissue, the BMP expression was not detectable. The percent of BMP-7 positive cells in breast cancer (86.4-/+7.3%) was higher than in prostatic cancer. Comparing BMP expression levels and clinicopathological parameters, we did not find statistical difference, except for serum alkaline phosphatase, which was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: The expression of BMPs differs between prostate and breast cancer cells. Identifying the BMP proteins in cancers may be useful for monitoring the tumor status with reference to metastases.

breast cancer

In the current study, we examined the function of N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) expression in breast cancer cells, especially focusing on the role of bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) induced by NDRG2. NDRG2 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells inhibited the mRNA expression of several matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9. Interestingly, a specific induction of active BMP-4 was exclusively observed in MDA-MB-231-NDRG2 cells but not in MDA-MB-231-mock cells. Neutralization of BMP-4 in MDA-MB-231-NDRG2 cells resulted in the rescue of MMP-9 mRNA expression and migration capacity. In addition, treatment with recombinant BMP-4 dramatically suppressed MMP-9 mRNA expression, gelatinolytic MMP-9 activity, migration, and invasion capacity both in MDA-MB-231 and PMA-treated MCF-7 cells. Collectively, our data show that BMP-4 induced by NDRG2 expression inhibits the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells, especially via suppression of MMP-9 activity.

head and neck cancer

AIM: To analyze the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in prostate and breast cancers with established metastasis in bone, where prostate cancer causes osteoblastic metastases, and breast cancer osteolytic metastases. METHODS: Primary tumor specimens from 20 patients with prostate cancer and 15 with breast cancer were studied for BMP-2/4, -3, -5, -6 and -7 immunohistochemistry. All patients had multiple bone metastases proven by bone scan. We also examined BMPs expression in normal prostate and breast tissues. BMPs expression was compared with clinicopathological and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: Cytoplasmic BMPs immunostaining was observed in both prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue. expression of BMP-2/4, -5, -6, and -7 proteins was detected in all normal prostate samples, with the predominance of BMP-2/4 (87.8-/+11.4% positive cells) and BMP-7 (94.6-/+0.9% positive cells). In prostate cancer tissues, we found variable expression of all BMPs. BMP-2/4 (83-/+11.6% positive cells) was predominantly expressed in prostate carcinoma, whereas the expression of BMP-7 (24.3-/+19.2% positive cells) was significantly lower than in the normal prostate. In all breast cancers tissues, we found nuclear staining only for BMP-7. In normal breast tissue, the BMP expression was not detectable. The percent of BMP-7 positive cells in breast cancer (86.4-/+7.3%) was higher than in prostatic cancer. Comparing BMP expression levels and clinicopathological parameters, we did not find statistical difference, except for serum alkaline phosphatase, which was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: The expression of BMPs differs between prostate and breast cancer cells. Identifying the BMP proteins in cancers may be useful for monitoring the tumor status with reference to metastases.

prostate cancer

AIM: To analyze the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in prostate and breast cancers with established metastasis in bone, where prostate cancer causes osteoblastic metastases, and breast cancer osteolytic metastases. METHODS: Primary tumor specimens from 20 patients with prostate cancer and 15 with breast cancer were studied for BMP-2/4, -3, -5, -6 and -7 immunohistochemistry. All patients had multiple bone metastases proven by bone scan. We also examined BMPs expression in normal prostate and breast tissues. BMPs expression was compared with clinicopathological and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: Cytoplasmic BMPs immunostaining was observed in both prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue. expression of BMP-2/4, -5, -6, and -7 proteins was detected in all normal prostate samples, with the predominance of BMP-2/4 (87.8-/+11.4% positive cells) and BMP-7 (94.6-/+0.9% positive cells). In prostate cancer tissues, we found variable expression of all BMPs. BMP-2/4 (83-/+11.6% positive cells) was predominantly expressed in prostate carcinoma, whereas the expression of BMP-7 (24.3-/+19.2% positive cells) was significantly lower than in the normal prostate. In all breast cancers tissues, we found nuclear staining only for BMP-7. In normal breast tissue, the BMP expression was not detectable. The percent of BMP-7 positive cells in breast cancer (86.4-/+7.3%) was higher than in prostatic cancer. Comparing BMP expression levels and clinicopathological parameters, we did not find statistical difference, except for serum alkaline phosphatase, which was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: The expression of BMPs differs between prostate and breast cancer cells. Identifying the BMP proteins in cancers may be useful for monitoring the tumor status with reference to metastases.

squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have recently been shown to be involved in the genesis and progression of a wide variety of carcinomas. The present study was undertaken to estimate the effect of BMP-4 on squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in tissue and cell levels. METHODS: In this study, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting and RT-PCR were utilized to detect the expression of BMP-4, Smad1 and phosphorylated Smad1 in SCCHN tissues or SCCHN cell lines. Those three proteins in tissues were further correlated with prognosis of SCCHN by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated changes in SCCHN cells were detected after stimulation by human BMP-4 recombinant protein and knockdown of Smad1 gene. Meanwhile, the effect on invasiveness and migration was evaluated by invasion and scratch assays, respectively. RESULTS: BMP-4 and p-Smad1 protein were overexpressed in SCCHN tissues with cervical lymph node metastasis, which was significantly higher than those without metastasis. The expression of BMP-4 and p-Smad1 protein was negatively correlated with the prognosis of SCCHN. BMP-4 promoted the invasiveness and migration through EMT, which was demonstrated by morphological alterations, loss of E-cadherin, increase of vimentin and activation of the Smad1 signal pathway. Knockdown of Smad1 expression suppressed BMP-4 induced EMT in both cell lines and weakened the invasiveness and migration of Tu686 and Tu212 in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that BMP-4 protein may contribute to the malignant metastasis of SCCHN, which presents as a novel prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target for patients with SCCHN.