55743

CHFR

checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase;CHFR;checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase

E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CHFR|RING finger protein 196

12q24.33

protein-coding

AIM: To investigate whether gene methylation in the peritoneal fluid (PF) predicts peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: The gene methylation of CHFR (checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains), p16, RUNX3 (runt-related transcription factor 3), E-cadherin, hMLH1 (mutL homolog 1), ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G, member 2) and BNIP3 (BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3) were analyzed in 80 specimens of PF by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Eighty patients were divided into 3 groups; Group A (n = 35): the depth of cancer invasion was less than the muscularis propria; Group B (n = 31): the depth of cancer invasion was beyond the muscularis propria. Both group A and B were diagnosed as no cancer cells in peritoneal cytology and histology; Group C (n = 14): disseminated nodule was histologically diagnosed or cancer cells were cytologically defined in the peritoneal cavity. RESULTS: The positive rates of methylation in CHFR, E-cadherin and BNIP3 were significantly different among the 3 groups and increased in order of group A, B and C (0%, 0% and 21% in CHFR, P < 0.05; 20%, 45% and 50% in E-cadherin, P < 0.05; 26%, 35% and 71% in BNIP3, P < 0.05). In addition, the multigene methylation rate among CHFR, E-cadherin and BNIP3 was correlated with group A, B and C (9%, 19% and 57%, P < 0.001). Moreover, the prognosis was analyzed in group B, excluding 3 patients who underwent a non-curative resection. Two of the 5 patients with multigene methylation showed peritoneal recurrence after surgery, while those without or with a single gene methylation did not experience recurrence (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that gene methylation in the PF could detect occult neoplastic cells in the peritoneum and might be a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Transcriptional silencing induced by hypermethylation of CpG islands in the promoter regions of genes is believed to be an important mechanism of carcinogenesis in human cancers including gastric cancer. A number of reports on methylation of various genes in gastric cancer have been published, but most of these studies focused on cancer tissues or only a single gene. In this study, we determined the promoter hypermethylation status and mRNA expression of 4 genes: p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR. METHODS: Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) was used to determine the methylation status of p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR gene promoters in cancer and adjacent normal gastric mucosa specimens from 70 patients with gastric cancer, as well as normal gastric biopsy samples from 30 people without cancer serving as controls. In addition, the mRNA expression of p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR was investigated in 34 gastric cancer patients by RT-PCR. Bisulfite DNA sequence analysis was applied to check the positive samples detected by MSP. RESULTS: When carcinoma specimens were compared with adjacent normal gastric mucosa samples, a significant increase in promoter methylation of p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR was observed, while all 30 histologically normal gastric specimens were methylation free for all 4 genes. The methylation rate of the 4 genes increased from normal stomach tissue to tumor-adjacent gastric mucosa to gastric cancer tissue. Concurrent methylation in 2 or more genes was found in 22.9% of tumor-adjacent normal gastric mucosa and 75.7% of cancer tissues. No correlation was found between hypermethylation and other clinicopathological parameters such as sex, age, and tumor location. However, the frequency of DAPK and CHFR methylation in cancer tissues was significantly associated with the extent of differentiation and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05) and the frequency of Runx3 methylation was significantly associated with tumor size (P < 0.05). Weak expression and loss of expression of the 4 genes was observed in cancer tissues and was significantly associated with promoter hypermethylation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Promoter hypermethylation of p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR is frequent in gastric cancer. DAPK and CHFR promoter hypermethylation may be an important help in evaluating the differentiation grade and lymph node status of gastric cancer. Weak gene expression and loss of gene expression due to promoter hypermethylation may be a cancer-specific event.