2068

ERCC2

excision repair cross-complementation group 2;ERCC2;excision repair cross-complementation group 2

BTF2 p80|CXPD|DNA excision repair protein ERCC-2|DNA repair protein complementing XP-D cells|TFIIH 80 kDa subunit|TFIIH basal transcription factor complex 80 kDa subunit|TFIIH basal transcription factor complex helicase XPB subunit|TFIIH basal transcripti

19q13.3

protein-coding

INTRODUCTION: Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) and excision-repair cross-complementing repair deficiency group 2 protein (ERCC2 or XPD) may modulate the activity of platinum derivatives. The SNPs, Ile105Val for GSTP1 and Lys751Gln for ERCC2, may affect the efficiency of oxaliplatin in patients treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS & METHODS: A total of 107 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 59 with an oxaliplatin-based regimen and 48 with an irinotecan-based regimen, were included retrospectively. GSTP1 and ERCC2 genotypes were identified on DNA samples extracted from paraffin blocks containing either normal tissue (nodes) or tumor tissue. We analyzed treatment response, event-free and overall survival. RESULTS: GSTP1 genotype distribution was Ile/Ile 58%, Ile/Val 35% and Val/Val 7%. ERCC2 genotype distribution was Lys/Lys 49%, Lys/Gln 44%, Gln/Gln 7%. Event-free and overall survivals were not significantly different as a function of the GSTP1 genotype, whatever the treatment received. Event-free survival was significantly different as a function of the ERCC2 genotype only in patients receiving oxaliplatin: patients having at least one variant allele had a shorter median event-free survival (6 months) than those having no variant allele (11.6 months, p = 0.008). This difference was maintained for median overall survival (15.6 vs 25.3 months, p = 0.016). Using univariate analysis, ERCC2 genotype, hemoglobinemia and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 plasma levels were significantly related to overall and event-free survival in patients receiving oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION: The ERCC2 genotype appears as an important predictive factor of the survival of patients treated with oxaliplatin in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To confirm the efficacy and toxicity of Erlotinib in combination with Gemcitabine and Capecitabine when used as a first-line therapy in metastatic/recurrent pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Locally advanced PC was excluded. Erlotinib was given at a dose of 100 mg daily from D1 to D28. 1000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine was given on D1,8,15 and 1660 mg/m(2)/day of capecitabine was given from D1 to 21, repeated every 4 weeks. Response was assessed every 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. Response rate and disease control rate was 32.6% (95% CI, 18.6-46.6%) and 83.7% (95% CI, 72.7-94.7%) respectively. The PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-9.7) and OS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.6-15.9). The Gr 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia (6.8%), thrombocytopenia (3.2%), anemia (1.6%). nausea (1.6%), vomiting (1.6%), anorexia (5.3%), rash (2.4%). The EGFR expression was associated with shorter OS and ERCC2 expression was associated with longer PFS and OS. PFS and OS were not different according to K-RAS mutation or polymorphism of RRM1 and CDA. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib, gemcitabine and capecitabine combination showed promising efficacy and good tolerability in metastatic PC. This efficacy was observed irrespective of K-RAS mutation, and EGFR expression was poor prognostic factor for OS.