1082

CGB

chorionic gonadotropin, beta polypeptide;CGB;chorionic gonadotropin, beta polypeptide

CG-beta|choriogonadotropin subunit beta|chorionic gonadotrophin chain beta|chorionic gonadotropin beta 3 subunit|chorionic gonadotropin beta chain|chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit

19q13.32

protein-coding

BACKGROUND: metastasis is a common feature of many advanced stage cancers and metastatic spread is thought to be responsible for cancer progression. Most cancer cells are localized in the primary tumor and only a small population of circulating tumor cells (CTC) has metastatic potential. CTC amount reflects the aggressiveness of tumors, therefore their detection can be used to determine the prognosis and treatment of cancer patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit (CGB) and gonadoliberin type 1 (GNRH1) expression as markers of tumor cells circulating in peripheral blood of gynecological cancer patients, indicating the metastatic spread of tumor. METHODS: CGB and GNRH1 expression level in tumor tissue and blood of cancer patients was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. The data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and Spearman tests. In order to distinguish populations with homogeneous genes' expression the maximal likelihood method for one- and multiplied normal distribution was used. RESULT: Real time RT-PCR results revealed CGB and GNRH1 genes activity in both tumor tissue and blood of gynecological cancers patients. While the expression of both genes characterized all examined tumor tissues, in case of blood analysis, the transcripts of GNRH1 were found in all cancer patients while CGB were present in 93% of patients. CGB and GNRH1 activity was detected also in control group, which consisted of tissue lacking cancerous changes and blood of healthy volunteers. The log-transformation of raw data fitted to multiplied normal distribution model showed that CGB and GNRH1 expression is heterogeneous and more than one population can be distinguished within defined groups.Based on CGB gene activity a critical value indicating the presence of cancer cells in studied blood was distinguished. In case of GNRH1 this value was not established since the results of the gene expression in blood of cancer patients and healthy volunteers were overlapping. However one subpopulation consists of cancer patient with much higher GNRH1 expression than in control group was found. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of CGB and GNRH1 expression level in cancer patients' blood may be useful for indicating metastatic spread of tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: Membrane-associated human chorionic gonadotropin beta (HCGbeta) is correlated with a poor prognosis in localized prostate adenocarcinoma. The relationship between HCGbeta and metastasis, however, is unclear. METHODS: To shed some light on the issue, two stable prostate carcinoma cell lines overexpressing HCGbeta, designated DU145 HCGbeta and PC3 HCGbeta, were created and compared with empty vector stably transfected DU145 and PC3 cells (control cells). RESULTS: HCGbeta expression resulted in a change in morphology; the cells were more elongated and had multiple pseudopodia, while the control cells were more rounded. This change in morphology was duplicated by incubating control cells in conditioned medium from the DU145 HCGbeta or PC3 HCGbeta cells, or by adding purified HCGbeta to control medium. The DU145 HCGbeta and PC3 HCGbeta cells were also less adherent than the controls, as assessed by the ease with which trypsin-EDTA could remove them from culture plates. Reduced adherence could be duplicated by incubation of control cells with either conditioned medium or purified HCGbeta. Western blot analysis showed that DU145 HCGbeta and PC3 HCGbeta cells expressed less E-cadherin than control cells and that a change of medium increased expression of E-cadherin. Addition of conditioned medium, or purified HCGbeta, to control cells down-regulated E-cadherin. Cell migration and invasion assays showed that DU145 HCGbeta and PC3 HCGbeta cells were more migratory and invasive than controls and that treatment of control cells with either conditioned medium or purified HCGbeta increased their migratory/invasive capacity. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that HCGbeta is directly responsible for changes in prostate carcinoma cells associated with an increased metastatic phenotype.